When three of the biggest names compete, the winner has to be the consumer. Right? Or may be not. It's the competition of innovation vs cutting edge vs power and market share. If you had to pick one of these three for you portfolio, which one would you pick? In what order? And Why?
Here's my order -
1) Apple
2) Microsoft
3) Google
Apple as number one because there is constant innovation and they involve themselves in cutting edge technology, which gives them the highest probability and thus my portfolio the greatest odds of making it big.
Microsoft as number two because even on their worst day, they still don't put me on the streets. It is the least risky of the three as Microsoft has the incredible market share to sustain itself.
Google as the last as there is hardly any variety and that decreases the odds of increasing my gain next to nil.
What is it going to be for you? Is it innovation or cutting edge or power and market share?
I think my order would be the following:-
ReplyDelete1. Microsoft : "Can't live without them"
2. Apple : " Creativity with a price"
3. Google : " Curing Curiousness."